Re: [ARM32] panic when sshd responding

[Chris Gilbert <chris%dokein.co.uk@localhost>]

Jason Thorpe wrote:
> 
> On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Matt Thomas wrote:
> 
>> Upon further thought, I think the socket loan code should use
>> pmap_enter/pmap_remove instead pmap_kenter_pa/pmap_kremove.
> 
> Probably a fine thing to do.  What other uses of kenter are lurking that
> require being able to do the work in interrupt context?

Would this break the some of the assumptions that uvm_loan makes?

By making it a managed page do we lose the protection against the loaned
page being written to?

Thanks,
Chris