Re: UFS_DIRHASH stable?

["Matthew Mondor" <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

On Thursday, 10 Apr 2008 11:06:22
Simon Burge <simonb%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:

> Is UFS_DIRHASH stable these days?

From last I remember it was considered broken on SMP (with noted
symptom of "random kernel memory corruption").  I however see that on
-current the code changed since then (locking macros no longer seem to
be noops, so it could be better).  I use it on a uniprocessor system
without problems on netbsd-4 however, where the locking macros still
seem noops...
-- 
Matthew Mondor