[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: mjf-devfs2 branch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mar 30, 2008, at 06:28, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 03:13:52AM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
Matt Fleming wrote:
* dctl: the devfs control device node that allows devfsd to
communicate with and manipulate devfs mounts. This
The first names coming to my mind when thinking about a control node
would be "devfsctl" or "devctl". Why did you choose dctl?
"devfsctl" seems rather long, "devctl" seems ok but we aren't really
controlling devices. I don't particularly care what it's called. If
more people pick one of your choices, I'll switch.
I don't have a strong opinion here but I'd prefer devfsctl because it
seems more obvious, natural and in line with things like raidctl,
wsconsctl, scsictl and so on. With <drivername>ctl there's no room
for ambiguity, which is a good thing IMHO.
PS: it should be green ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Main Index |
Thread Index |