[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
whether or not to be specific to ac adapter (Re: CVS commit: src)
[ moved from source-changes@ ]
> > > > This is what my other patch implemented, but freza convinced me to use
> > > > this approach for simplicity.
> > >
> > > where was it discussed?
> > This was discussed between him and me privately, sorry.
> > Do you have any suggestion? I'd like to know what's the idea that you have
> > in mind. If we have a consensus about what's required and needed, I'll
> > implement this.
> i have suggested something in the first mail. have you read it?
> while i tend to agree that the provider/consumer model is a bit more
> complicated than necessary here, i don't think that limiting providers to
> ac adapters and batteries simplifies things a lot. what i suggested
> is a middle of them. ie. while allowing to have various providers which
> is not either ac adapters or batteries, consider the whole system as
> a single consumer.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
what's the status of this?
let me summarize my question; why do you want to distinguish ac adapter
from other possible power supplies? how ac adapter is special?
Main Index |
Thread Index |