[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:43:13PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost said:
> > The problem is not so much changing CFATTACH_DECL, the main problem is
> > distinguishing drivers that don't support it.
> These could have a NULL pointer at that point, as done eg
> for the "childdetached" or "rescan" methods.
No handler != not supported.
Main Index |
Thread Index |