Re: scheduler support to lock user processes out?

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:37:57PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost said:
> > It is not more work than the general MPsafeness of the driver. Holding
> > the kernel lock helps for those that are not MPsafe, but that's it. 
> 
> So do you agree that we should take the kernel lock
> in pmf_system_suspend(), as in my patch?

I'm not sure if you get the desired result from that...
But I don't object it either.

Joerg