[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lvm sysinst patch
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:42:35PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> >Any comments ?
> Is offering the menu item really worth the increase in space for the
> ramdisk? If there's a deeper thought, then this should be reflected in the
> install docs, at least ("If you intend to use LVM, do ...").
> Having LVM documented in the NetBSD Guide could go as a nice alternative
> for this (Have a chapter "How to install a system with LVM enabled" in
> the Guide, and the reference this in the install docs).
imo, if we're going to offer a feature and have any desire for it to be
widely used it should be obviously present in the "normal" way of installing
You seem to be arguing *against* making the use of lvm user friendly. Am
I interpreting you correctly? And if so, why?
(I'm assuming that the menu item to run "lvm" actually does something
user friendly, but I haven't looked at it)
Main Index |
Thread Index |