Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

[Marcin Jessa <lists%yazzy.org@localhost>]

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:36:44 +0200 (MEST)
"Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost> wrote:

> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler%riscworks.net@localhost>
> > An: "Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost>
> > Kopie: lists%yazzy.org@localhost, tech-embed%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
> > tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
> > Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> > Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:23:49 +0200
> > 
> > > 
> > > That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want
> > > to run NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy
> > > and under
> > heavy
> > > development.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > (besides the massive x-posting: am i missing <irony> </irony> tags?
> > aren't there
> > several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)
> > 
> Name one.

www.wasabisystems.com
And please stop replying to this thread, you're not bringing any
reasonable information to it and all you do is trolling.

 
> There is recently no embedded hardware running NetBSD. Also in the
> past, there were barely any Product running NetBSD OS.
> 
> > hm, i think then it's time to do it again? ;)
> > 
> 
> Nice approach.
> 
> -Z.
>