Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

["Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost>]

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler%riscworks.net@localhost>
> An: "Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost>
> Kopie: lists%yazzy.org@localhost, tech-embed%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
> tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
> Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:23:49 +0200
> 
> > 
> > That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want to run
> > NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy and under
> heavy
> > development.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> (besides the massive x-posting: am i missing <irony> </irony> tags? aren't
> there
> several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)
> 
Name one.

There is recently no embedded hardware running NetBSD. Also in the past,
there were barely any Product running NetBSD OS.

> hm, i think then it's time to do it again? ;)
> 

Nice approach.

-Z.