Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

CVS commit: src



Module Name:    src
Committed By:   riastradh
Date:           Sat Jul 18 04:26:42 UTC 2026

Modified Files:
        src/libexec/ld.elf_so: reloc.c rtld.c rtld.h
        src/tests/libexec/ld.elf_so: t_dlclose_thread.c

Log Message:
ld.elf_so: Fix more races with recursive threaded dlopen/dlclose.

1. When loading an object, keep track of a finer-grained state for
   relocation so that a concurrent _rtld_relocate_objects doesn't
   relocate an object too early (e.g., while waiting in
   _rtld_load_needed_objects for an object that is concurrently being
   dlclosed to finish before we can map it afresh) leading to
   spurious symbol resolution failures:

   - OBJRELOC_NONE (0): object has been created but the rtld state
     isn't enough to attempt relocation yet (either not all DT_NEEDED
     entries have been resolved, or the dldags lists have not yet
     been populated)

   - OBJRELOC_READY (1): object has been created and rtld state is
     ready to relocate (all DT_NEEDED entries have been resolved and
     the dldags lists have been populated), but object has not yet
     been relocated.

   - OBJRELOC_DONE (2): object has been relocated successfully.

   - OBJRELOC_FAILED (3): relocation failed, e.g. because of symbol
     resolution failure.

   Allowed transitions:

   - NONE->READY
   - READY->DONE
   - READY->FAILED

2. When calling dlopen/dlclose from an object's constructor or
   destructor, exclude that object and any object that needs it from
   the topological ordering of objects for constructor/destructor calls
   inside dlopen/dlclose -- we can't re-enter the same object's
   constructor or destructor, and before the object's constructor or
   destructor has returned (which can't happen until the recursive
   dlopen or dlclose has returned), it would be wrong to invoke the
   constructor or destructor of any object that needs it.

3. When dlclosing an object, mark any of its dagmembers as busy
   dlclosing so a concurrent GC loop at the end of
   _rtld_unload_object doesn't free them while we sleep in init/fini
   functions before we can remove the DAG from the members' dldags.
   Later, at the end of this call to _rtld_unload_object, we will
   take care of them.

   This requires changing the boolean dlclosing state to an integer
   reference count.  `int' is big enough because each thread can hold
   at most one reference to each object, so the number of threads is
   an upper bound on the reference count.

Unfortunately, there is still a bug lurking: every now and then,
t_dlclose_thread:dlclose_thread_recursive2 trips one of the abort
branches in libh_helper_recurdso2.so, e.g. because the destructor for
libh_helper_recurdso.so ran first.  But the frequency of these
failures has gone down dramatically, from around 19/20 to about 1/20
trials.  Simply serializing dlopen/dlclose calls in an application is
likely to be an effective workaround.  And these changes fix issues
in single-threaded recursive dlopen/dlclose even if the multithreaded
case has a remaining low-probability race.

PR lib/59751: dlclose is not MT-safe depending on the libraries
unloaded


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.121 -r1.122 src/libexec/ld.elf_so/reloc.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.226 -r1.227 src/libexec/ld.elf_so/rtld.c
cvs rdiff -u -r1.156 -r1.157 src/libexec/ld.elf_so/rtld.h
cvs rdiff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 src/tests/libexec/ld.elf_so/t_dlclose_thread.c

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.




Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index