[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/ep93xx
>Would something like (untested!):
>- remaining = n * TIMER_FREQ / 1000000;
>+ remaining = (uint64_t)n * TIMER_FREQ / 1000000;
>do instead, forcing 64-bit arithmetic?
I admit to being lame and always forgetting the rules when it comes to
forcing different precision for arithmetic in C. My thinking was that
since there was something that I knew worked before and was faster, I
should go with that. I don't have an objection to this (or what Itzumi
posted), but is there a reason to not use the original code?
Main Index |
Thread Index |