Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, had a problems with free-time.
no problem.
> yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > cvs rdiff -r1.44 -r1.45 src/sys/sys/sched.h
> >
> > the change of struct sched_param broke the ABI. please revert.
>
> Sad thing that I have separately asked about this point in <tech-kern>...
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/sched_fixes_1.diff
>
> Can you please take a look?
i'll take a look, thanks.
> yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > while you can make it compatible, is there any reason to
> > make our native one (_sched_setaffinity) inherit the limitations?
> >
> > iirc recent linux has a set of macros to allocate dynamic-sized cpusets.
> > can you check?
>
> I have checked - yes (but no manual pages). CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(), CPU_ALLOC(),
> CPU_FREE() and a bunch of CPU_*_S() macros are used, but as I understand they
> still use static cpu_set_t (?).
my guess is that they are trying to migrate from static cpu_set_t by
introducing these macros.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> Not sure what solution we should pick.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mindaugas
> www.NetBSD.org
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index