Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/regress/lib/libc

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 03:19:13PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> Shouldn't new tests be written for atf instead of the old framework?  > 

It would if the ATF API was in C :-(.  I was easily able to knock
this out.  I did look at the ATF stuff but the lack of API
documentation, harry C++ macroness and no C API kept me away.  I
felt some test is better than no test.

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:43:33PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> In my opinion, yes.  I'm trying to get atf 0.4 out of the door soon,  
> which brings some needed API-related documentation that will be  
> hopefully useful to those writing new tests.

Maybe.  It would have certainly have helped.  But IMHO w/o a C API
it is less useful.  I also get the feeling that ATF may have an
incomplete API.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index