On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:02:34AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote: > Elad Efrat wrote: > > > also, where is the consensus of the class of programs to protect with > > USE_FORT taken from? and what's the reason for it? > > While talking about this change, it is too late to change the option > name to "USE_FORTIFY"? I can't see any reason for using the abbreviated > "FORT" in the name. seconded. -- Dan.
Description: PGP signature