On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote: > > cube%cubidou.net@localhost said: > > But what should be tested? Support for the compat syscall in the > > timecounters branch? > > This change is independant of the timecounters branch, so > the tests could be done right now. Yeah, right, independent. Looks more to me as "committed ahead of hte merge". > There would be 2 cases: old (eg 3.0) userland with COMPAT_30, > using the "short" struct ntptimeval, and new userland using > the "long" struct ntptimeval. > (assuming that COMPAT_30 on a 64-bit system affects both > native and 32bit support, which has been the case afaict) The thing is, netbsd32_get_ntptime is changed in the timecounters branch. I don't know how far we are from the merge, but is there a point of doing any change now that will have to be undone in the branch and re-done in some way for when the branch is ready to merge? I wish good luck to Frank and Simon for the next sync with HEAD, anyway. -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea." KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.
Attachment:
pgp2gAhjy16Xn.pgp
Description: PGP signature