On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 07:42:56AM +0100, David Laight wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:15:07PM -0500, James Chacon wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:34:45PM -0400, Jed Davis wrote: > > > Elad Efrat <elad%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes: > > > > > > > Zafer Aydogan wrote: > > > > > > > >> And there is surely a POSIX Rule > > > >> that says so aswell. > > > > > > > > Can you quote the POSIX "rule" that says so? > > > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/find.html > > > doesn't seem to say anything about slashes or canonicalization. > > > > Probably wouldn't be in that section anyways. It's (find) referring to > > dealing > > with pathnames and printing of said pathnames. The more general sections > > on pathnames in general will have anything about trailing slashes and uses. > > IIRC there is mention of double slashes having an implementation dependant > behaviour, but probably only initial ones. Indeed. See: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7990989799/xbd/glossary.html#tag_004_000_196 -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea." KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.
Attachment:
pgpHXae821bar.pgp
Description: PGP signature