On Friday, 10 October 2003 at 19:00:05 +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:27:08PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I think an improvement on the -F flag might be the way to go. It >> appears to want to do the same thing, and the only issue is that it >> wants a size specification, which I think would normally not be >> necessary. > > newfs -F needs the size because it's designed to work on regular > files. Well, in that case it needs it. If it can work out the size by itself, it shouldn't need it. That was the kind of consideration which made me write "normally" above. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
Attachment:
pgpD3mUst7pY4.pgp
Description: PGP signature