Source-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Subject: pr/5039 CVS commit: src/usr.bin/vacation
Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote on Sat, 19 Apr 2003
at 23:33:28 -0400 in <20030420033328.1BBD07E4D%beowulf.gw.com@localhost>:
> On Apr 19, 11:16pm, jhawk%MIT.EDU@localhost (John Hawkinson) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Subject: pr/5039 CVS commit: src/usr.bin/vacation
>
> I hear you. I added -t A|D to have the user explicitly look at these
> fields.
I cannot see a reason why it would ever be acceptable for it to look
at the Delivered-To: field. Can you please explain?
It seems like a guaranteed shot in the foot with no benefit
whatsoever.
As for the Apparently-To: field, I can't conceive of a good reason
to add the feature, though the shot-in-foot potential is much less. Can
you justify adding it, please?
--jhawk
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index