Re: CVS commit: basesrc/lib/libc

[itojun%iijlab.net@localhost]

> > (there are bunch of "strcpy is safe" comments, i think we should change them
> > to strlcpy as much as possible)
>If the strcpy() is safe, then what is the point of using another (slower)
>routine?

        strcpy() might have been safe when the comment is added, but we're not
        sure with changes after the addition of comments.  by using strlcpy
        we can ensure that the operation is bounded.
        (and we will make a function call anyways, so the speed does not
        really matter i believe)

itojun