Re: CVS commit: syssrc

[Simon Burge <simonb%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Jason Thorpe wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 18:25:38 -0800 (PST) 
>  Simon Burge <simonb%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> 
>  > Module Name:       syssrc
>  > Committed By:      simonb
>  > Date:              Wed Nov 24 02:25:38 UTC 1999
>  > 
>  > Modified Files:
>  >    syssrc/sys/arch/pmax/conf: GENERIC
>  > 
>  > Log Message:
>  > Wildcard 3max {asc,le}0 at tc attachment.
> 
> Why did you add these two lines?!
> 
> asc0    at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # NCR53C94 SCSI
> le0     at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # LANCE
> 
> There are already:
> 
> asc*    at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # PMAZ-A single channel SCSI
> le*     at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # PMAD-A LANCE
> 
> in the config file!

Because of the

asc0    at      ioasic? offset ?        # NCR53C94 SCSI with IOASIC

the onboard asc on a 3max was attaching at asc1, and because of

le0     at      ioasic? offset ?        # LANCE

the onboard le was attaching as le1.  I don't actually have a 5000/200
for testing (mine wont power up), but have been working with someone
over the last few days to get theirs working.  If you can try a GENERIC
kernel and it works _without_

asc0    at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # NCR53C94 SCSI
le0     at      tc? slot ? offset ?     # LANCE

then all well and good, but it hasn't until now.  If the ioasic and ibus
attachments were asc* and le* instead of asc0 and le0 (it works on a
3max+), would that be a better solution?

Simon.