Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/amrctl
What's wrong with printf("%s", NULL)? It produces '(null)', and at
least it's visible something is missing there. I think gcc 9.3 is
overly eager for this.
Is it correct to just omit the parameter altogether and change output format?
Jaromir
Le dim. 6 sept. 2020 à 04:41, matthew green <mrg%netbsd.org@localhost> a écrit :
>
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mrg
> Date: Sun Sep 6 02:34:03 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sbin/amrctl: amrctl.c
>
> Log Message:
> avoid calling printf() %s with NULL.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 src/sbin/amrctl/amrctl.c
>
> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> copyright notices on the relevant files.
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index