Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Leak Sanitizer - how to suppress leaks

On 14.09.2019 13:54, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 01:45:08PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> OK, thank you. So to sum it up. Plugging resource leaks costs time and
>> human effort and this is what is not wanted by some people. For those
>> who find it useless are not forced to do it, so can ignore it. For
>> others it can be useful activity.
>> Thanks! I will go for __NO_LEAKS ifdef.
> But it is not a good idea to clutter perfectly fine sources with such
> #ifdefs and unused/untested/likely broken code (even if it does not affect
> the default binaries).
> Martin

This is right. I don't intend to do this now/soon. I don't intend to do
it before passing all the tests in LSan/ASan and before getting valgrind

The most interesting target here is rumpkernel.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index