Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Multiple outstanding transfer vs xhci / ehci (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/usb)



On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:44:23PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> On 2019/02/15 21:57, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:35:14PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 2019/02/13 3:54, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > > > On 12/02/2019 16:02, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The system freezes indefinitely with xhci(4) or ehci(4), when NIC with
> > > > > multiple outstanding transfers [axen(4), mue(4), and ure(4)] is stopped
> > > > > by "ifconfig down" or detached.
> > > > > 
> > > > > As discussed in the previous message, this is due to infinite loop in
> > > > > usbd_ar_pipe(); xfers with USBD_NOT_STARTED remain in a queue forever
> > > > > because upm_abort [= xhci_device_bulk_abort() etc.] cannot remove them.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Why not the attached patch instead?
> > > > 
> > > > Nick
> > > 
> > > Thank you so much for your prompt reply!
> > > 
> > > It works if s/ux_state/ux_status/ here:
> > > 
> > > +		if (xfer->ux_state == USBD_NOT_STARTED) {
> > > 
> > > Can I commit the revised patch?
> > > 
> > 
> > The revised patch results in
> > https://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/sys/dev/usb/ehci.c?r=1.265#1566
> > firing upon `drvctl detach -d bwfm0` on Pinebook.
> > 
> > 	Jonathan Kollasch
> 
> IMO, this is because NOT_STARTED queues are removed in a way that is
> unexpected to ehci. For my old amd64 box, the attached patch fixes
> assertion failures when devices are detached from ehci. I would like
> to commit it together with the previous patch.
> 

Works for me; please commit.  (I'm not 100% sure it's perfect, but
it's better than it was, and we can fix it again later if necessary.)

	Jonathan Kollasch


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index