On 02.12.2017 16:55, Maxime Villard wrote: > Le 02/12/2017 à 14:22, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >> There are still users of NetBSD/i386 0.9 executables (like myself - of >> Franz Lisp). > > And? compat_09 is available on i386. > It used to work on the NetBSD/amd64 kernel. >> It's reasonable to drop compat for pre-ELF (approximately < 2.0) ... > > Yes, amd64 needs to start from compat_20. But compat_20 does not > compile: if > you include compat_netbsd20.config in GENERIC, you get "multiple definition > of _KERNEL_OPT_COMPAT_15 _KERNEL_OPT_COMPAT_16 etc". > > However, the current compat_netbsd15.config inclusion works, even though > compat_15 enables compat_20. > > So it looks like there is something going wrong in the dependencies. It > wouldn't be a big surprise, since no one has ever tested that. > < 2.0 compat is rotten on all levels. >> ... but it should be discussed and decided by core. > > No. I am not going to discuss basic changes like this one all the time. > (And > I am not mentioning here that in each of the two times I asked core@ to > decide on what to do, they were unable to formulate a single answer after > months, not recognizing the rules they had themselves stated when these > were > to be enforced. Fool me again.) > > Maxime OK, I will prompt about it myself.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature