Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/atari/stand/installboot
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:03:15PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Core was generated by `sed'.
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> ...
> 0x8c2b4: movel %d1,%a1@+
> 0x8c2b6: beqs 0x8c2be
> => 0x8c2b8: addql #1,%d0
> 0x8c2ba: cmpl %d0,%d2
> 0x8c2bc: bccs 0x8c2ac
> 0x8c2be: movel %sp@+,%d2
> 0x8c2c0: unlk %fp
> 0x8c2c2: rts
More interesting how it got there:
(gdb) x/16i 0x0006fce0
0x6fce0: lea 0x8c296,%a2
0x6fce6: jsr %a2@
0x6fce8: movel %d0,%d4
indirect function pointer call via %a2 to:
(gdb) x/16i 0x8c296
0x8c296: linkw %fp,#0
0x8c29a: movel %d2,%sp@-
0x8c29c: movel %fp@(16),%d2
0x8c2a0: moveal %fp@(12),%a0
0x8c2a4: moveal %a0@,%a0
0x8c2a6: moveal %fp@(8),%a1
0x8c2aa: clrl %d0
0x8c2ac: tstl %a0
0x8c2ae: beqs 0x8c2be
0x8c2b0: clrl %d1
0x8c2b2: moveb %a0@+,%d1
0x8c2b4: movel %d1,%a1@+
0x8c2b6: beqs 0x8c2be
=> 0x8c2b8: addql #1,%d0
I still don't see the segmentation violation - what am I missing?
Gdb is a bit confused about the stack:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008c2b8 in ?? ()
#1 0xffffaba4 in ?? ()
#2 0xffffbc34 in ?? ()
#3 0x0006fce8 in ?? ()
#4 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Martin
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index