Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/config

[Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:49 AM, David Holland
<dholland-sourcechanges%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>  > So, while you expect that "options" works before it's defined, you
>  > also expect the order is honored for "no" use.  I'm not sure how it
>  > can work internally.
>  >
>  > At this moment, "no" are evaluated when it's parsed.  Those "no agp*"
>  > fallouts happened because agp is re-selected while resolving
>  > dependency after all parsing is done.  IMO anything relying on order
>  > tends to be broken by design.  For example: if BAR depends on FOO, "no
>  > options FOO" has to disable BAR too, because BAR can't be enabled
>  > without FOO.  But when you re-enable FOO, BAR is not enabled.  Is this
>  > really what you're expecting?
>
> I think it's important not to break the semantics of this.

Sure, but this makes me rather depressive.