[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/config
> On Oct 29, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 11:14am, uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/config
> | Could you show me an example failure senario? What do you propose instead?
> I don't have anything *better* to propose. I think mach-o constructors
> are different.
> | I heard that rump fixed linkset problem using .ctors/.dtors.
> | But .ctors/.dtors in kernel is just analogy of the userland one; it
> | may use the same section names but the internal behavior can be
> | defferent.
> Sure, I am not sure that all the object formats support them though.
arm doesn’t use .ctors/.dtors
it has init/fini array instead.
and where would they be executed?
Main Index |
Thread Index |