[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/news68k/conf
> ok, so naively I would think that *reordering* blocks wouldn't change
> their size, or at least not much... does anyone know where this 10%
> overhead comes from? Is it all jump instructions?
Probably it moves and aligns reordered "branch taken" blocks
at cacheline and there might be something wrong around
MD parameters (but I have not checked at all).
Main Index |
Thread Index |