Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/news68k/conf

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

dholland@ wrote:

> ok, so naively I would think that *reordering* blocks wouldn't change
> their size, or at least not much... does anyone know where this 10%
> overhead comes from? Is it all jump instructions?

Probably it moves and aligns reordered "branch taken" blocks
at cacheline and there might be something wrong around
MD parameters (but I have not checked at all).

---
Izumi Tsutsui