[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/raidframe
On Apr 3, 8:10am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/raidframe
| > > 4. we can add an option to mark the raid as force root.
| > if we do 4, we should instead add an option to mark something as a
| > 'soft root', and leave the current semantics alone. the machines i
| > have that are now not going to reboot properly are both used
| > remotely, so changing semantics about how they work seems like a
| > bad idea. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one who does this.
| > i think i like this the best.
| oh, actually. we already (can) have "soft root". by marking
| something as auto-configure, and booting from it.
| what we want to change from what the past has been is to enable
| the auto-configured raids to be used as root when booted from,
| without them being marked -A root. we should still keep the
| current -A root semantics, and then people can stop using -A
| root when they don't need to force it, and just use -A yes.
This has the problem of having a raid component on the same boot disk
with the real root partition.
Main Index |
Thread Index |