Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/powerpc/powerpc
In article <20140318143431.920A298%cvs.netbsd.org@localhost>,
Michael Lorenz <source-changes-d%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>+#ifdef PPC_OEA601
>+static struct timecounter powerpc_601_timecounter = {
>+ get_601_timecount, /* get_timecount */
>+ 0, /* no poll_pps */
>+ 0x7fffffff, /* counter_mask */
>+ 0, /* frequency */
>+ "rtc", /* name */
>+ 100, /* quality */
>+ NULL, /* tc_priv */
>+ NULL /* tc_next */
>+};
>+#endif
>+
> static struct timecounter powerpc_timecounter = {
> get_powerpc_timecount, /* get_timecount */
> 0, /* no poll_pps */
> 0x7fffffff, /* counter_mask */
> 0, /* frequency */
>-#if PPC_OEA601
>- "rtc", /* name */
>-#else
> "mftb", /* name */
>-#endif
> 100, /* quality */
> NULL, /* tc_priv */
> NULL /* tc_next */
Can we use c99 field initializers here instead of comments?!?
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index