Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src

In article <>,
Martin Husemann  <> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:33:05PM -0200, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
>> I also have no problem to step back and use 'long long', if _we_
>> choose to reconsider that. IMHO, the fact that Lua 5.3 is using 'long
>> long' is a good argument for that. I do prefer explicit width type,
>> but my main argument is that 'long long' width could be lesser than 64
>> bit.
>Using long long is as arbitrary as using int64_t.
>The only reasonable other choice would be intmax_t (and I'm suprised
>Lua did not pick that).
>However, none of these make a difference with any of the currently
>supported architectures, so this argument is of cosmetic nature.

Heh, this is why I suggested using intmax_t in the first place :-)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index