Zitat von Jeff Rizzo <riz%NetBSD.org@localhost>:
Module Name: src
Committed By: riz
Date: Fri Nov 22 18:58:01 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Comment out npf for now, as we can't have both NPF and PF in the
same kernel - rmind has said he'll address this eventually,
and for now PF is more likely to have unnoticed breakage. ALL now
builds again!
Wouldn't it make a more sense to disable pf since npf sees actual
development, so testing it would actually help (and ALL is not meant
to be run anyways)?
To me compile testing npf would make much more sense than pf... ymmv.