Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libpthread

> >| Furthermore, was it safe to add a new pthread_condattr_setclock(3) function
> >| without libpthread minor bump?  I'm afraid pkgsrc ruby193 (and other)
> >| binaries built on 6.1 silently fails on 6.0.1.
> >
> >It was a mistake, we should have bumped.
> Note, that bumping would have just changed the nature of the failure, would
> not have fixed the problem.

Is it generally acceptable to bump minor
(i.e. adding new public functions in libs)
in release branches?

I'm afraid not all third party programs use proper configure script.

Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index