[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:20PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Nov 22, 4:39am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
> -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/pkill
> | this seems like a fairly big semantic change to me.
> | could you change it to take a new option to look in argv instead
> | of p_comm? p_comm is not changeable by the user.
> You could already do this with -f. The point was to make the default case
> behave intuitively. Adding an option is against that. I could add backwards
> compatibility by checking both, but I think that in the long term this will
> be dangerous and confusing (since you might end up killing more than you
> thought you would...)
That (killing too much) is always true when you use something like pkill().
At least it is better that the 'ps | grep' I've seen many people do!
Is pkill() guaranteed to do an atomic traversal of the process list?
So it will kill something that keeps using fork() to change its pid.
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |