[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man4
Am 30.08.11 18:44, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:33:18PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> Am 30.08.11 18:22, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
>> And why should GENERIC *not* support hardware that is available, works,
>> and is of use to someone? If GENERIC is to support only the idea of
>> what an OS should look for some developers, why do we ship GENERIC at
>> all and not tell folks to create their own kernels?
> I don't disagree on principle. But sooner or later you end up with
> tremendous amount legacy stuff and things that 0.001 % of people use.
> And then people go and compile their own kernels because of that.
To address this issue, I think we are slowly moving towards modularized
kernels. So what I said is about drivers and kernel subsystem, that are
not yet available as modules. But modules are still WIP, and I think
there are still a few problems left to be solved before we can say we
are an OS with a modular kernel.
> Do you think Linux distributions ship kernels with all their drivers
> compiled into one monolithic unit? And why not?
I don't care what Linux does. This is BSD. Memory does not matter.
There is no reason to not include stuff in a kernel.
> - Jukka.
>  For years, it was more than annoying that even the installation kernel
> lacked e.g. cgd(4). Even today, many *important* things are commented
> out, while many inane things from the early 1990s are compiled in.
And when uncomment sth you need, you get yelled at, "USE YOUR OWN KERNEL
Main Index |
Thread Index |