Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/librumphijack



On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:41:57 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > > On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > > > Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
> > > > > check at the top level, without resorting to rtld tricks?
> > > > 
> > > > Let me try to summarize the situation to make sure I get it right:
> > > > 
> > > > The fortification code wants to provide an inline function "read" that
> > > > calls the real "read" after doing the argument checks.
> > > > 
> > > > rumphijack wants to override the "read" symbol, apply some magic and
> > > > call "_sys_read" for the real system call.
> > > 
> > > No, it wants to override "whatever is the symbol applications are
> > > resolved to".  For -current this is "_sys_read" (on nb5 it's "read").
> > 
> > That's not what the library is doing according to nm. It defines "read"
> > and not "_sys_read".
> 
> Are you sure you're looking at a current version?
> 
> pain-rustique:1:~> nm /usr/lib/librumphijack.so | grep read
> 000029d4 T _sys_read
>          U pthread_create
>          U pthread_join
> 00002a42 T readv

I have different builds arounds. So why is _sys_read special and readv,
write, writev etc are not?

Joerg


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index