[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src
> > Why not simply using bus_space(9) for non-cachable I/O?
> > (like sys/arch/arc/arc/bus_space_sparse.c)
> I think the reason for not using was bus space was the lack of an MI
> tag for physmem. That said, I don't mind if someone wants to convert
> the driver to dance around bus space or do other kinds of maintenance.
I guess bus_space_map(9) + bus_space_vaddr(9) will work,
but for now we should put large XXX mark to those functions
in MI arch/mips...
Main Index |
Thread Index |