On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:07:05AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:Log Message: Point to module(9) instead of modctl(8).We really need module(4) (not 9) like lkm(4)...Agreed. Another question is the ever so terrible sysctl(7). (I think it should be split, but I don't have a clear plan on how to make it more sensible / readable.)
A quick read of lkm.4 shows that much of its contents is sufficiently generic as to still be applicable to modules. And most of the rest should be fairly easy to update/modify. If I can find some spare time, I might give it a try, unless someone does it sooner.
As for sysctl(7), that one is just a monstrous nightmare. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com | | Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net | | Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org | -------------------------------------------------------------------------