[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:57:27 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:43:33PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 16:24:40 +0000, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > > > src/sys/sys: exec_elf.h
> > > >
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > Replace the current usage of Elf64_Half with Elf64_Word and rename
> > > > NetBSD specific Elf64_Quarter to Elf64_Half. This restores compatibility
> > > > with the common ELF specifications.
> > >
> > > I believe this change is what's causing alpha to blow up:
> > >
> > > /src/nbsrc/external/bsd/libdwarf/dist/dwarf_dump.c:884: warning: format
> > > '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'Elf64_Word'
> > > /src/nbsrc/external/bsd/libdwarf/dist/dwarf_dump.c:886: warning: format
> > > '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'Elf64_Word'
> > >
> > > There's (still) a ton of lint warnings in libdwarf, but they don't seem to
> > > have changed for i386, at least.
> > sys/arch/alpha/include/elf_machdep.h:
> > /*
> > * Alpha ELF uses different (non-standard) definitions of Elf64_Sword
> > * and Elf64_Word.
> > */
> > typedef int64_t Elf64_Sword;
> > #define ELF64_FSZ_SWORD 8
> > typedef uint64_t Elf64_Word;
> > #define ELF64_FSZ_WORD 8
> That violates the ELF API as specified by SCO again. Is there any reason
> why Alpha has to be special and can't just use the standard types?
also, why does alpha use non standard platform magic number?
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
Main Index |
Thread Index |