[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs
On Mon Sep 14 2009 at 08:15:36 +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > In the future if you run across a problem which you are unable to
> > understand, debug and fix on your own, please ask for assistance.
> > Commits with handwavy and incorrect information make it more difficult
> > to track down and fix the real issues.
> I tried to contact you on several occasions, but you chose to ignore me.
I'm sorry, then. The commit messages and this are the only emails I've
seen from you on the subject. Maybe you should quote something like
"no comment from foo" in a commit message in the future?
> > The binutils regression is that between 2.16 and 2.19 __start_sectname
> > for orphaned sections was changed to use PROVIDE instead of define and
> > hence those symbols are not available anymore in library components
> > produced with ld. I have provided a quick workaround which allows the
> > build to work with both with 2.16 and 2.19 while not silently breaking
> > functionality like in your model.
> > Please revert all of your incorrect commits.
> Feel free to fix rump and linksets correctly. It's been explained to you why
> they can't work properly together.
rump hasn't relied on linksets since August 2008 (and even then there was
only a few day window of linkset use after introducing dynamic linking
to rump). The only thing that matters is the entry point, which,
incidentally, is what binutils 2.19 chaged.
Main Index |
Thread Index |