[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 08:52:39AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 08:03:54AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > > I suggested that to ad in private email earlier. UFS1 is still good
> > > > > for
> > > > > small file systems because it has less overhead.
> > > >
> > > > Is the possible overhead noticeable on the modern CPU?
> > > > If not, it's okay to change default per port basis
> > > > because users can still change it to UFS1 manually.
> > >
> > > It is not about CPU, it is about disk space usage. Inodes are twice the
> > > size and that sums up depending on the file system size.
> > Then, is it matter for modern GB HDD? ;-p
> Yes, as the default settings for big filesystems are still lots of
> inodes. E.g. for /home, I got 10 million inodes. An additional 128 Bytes
> per inode sums up. This scales with the size of the filesystem...
Only 1GB in 500GB or 1TB?
Are you objecting making UFS2 default even on amd64 and i386,
even if you can change it manually?
Main Index |
Thread Index |