Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 08:03:54AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > I suggested that to ad in private email earlier. UFS1 is still good for
> > > small file systems because it has less overhead.
> > 
> > Is the possible overhead noticeable on the modern CPU?
> > If not, it's okay to change default per port basis
> > because users can still change it to UFS1 manually.
> It is not about CPU, it is about disk space usage. Inodes are twice the
> size and that sums up depending on the file system size.

Then, is it matter for modern GB HDD? ;-p
Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index