[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst
> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> writes:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 01:13:38AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> >> Like this?
> > Looks good - one more evil idea: do we know the size of the target disk
> > at this point already? (I think so...)
> > We could make UFS2 the default for everything > 50GB or some arbitrary
> > threshold.
> I suggested that to ad in private email earlier. UFS1 is still good for
> small file systems because it has less overhead.
Is the possible overhead noticeable on the modern CPU?
If not, it's okay to change default per port basis
because users can still change it to UFS1 manually.
We already have a bunch of overhead (daddr_t, time_t etc),
and anyone can implement it if we really want it.
(Andrew has much more important tasks with higher priority ;-)
Main Index |
Thread Index |