[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: agr(4) + bridge(4): problems!
On 09/28/12 15:52, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:57:11AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
You mean, for agr+bridge ?
I suspect link1 is causing the issue you're seeing: without any LACP
negotiation, a packet going out by wm0 will be received on wm1, and
Why? wm0 and wm1 aren't in the bridge, and if you have LACP turned off
entirely, the host on the other end must be configured so it doesn't
reflect packets this way, either.
But in his setup, if I understood it properly, the other end is a switch,
which probably can't deal gracefully with this setup.
It is indeed a switch without support for LACP. The manpage does say
link1 disables LACP.
Note that the network works fine on the dom0 using agr0, it's only when
agr0 is on a bridge that problems appear (and even then the host's
networking, running with agr0 as the primary interface, still works). I
mention this because if the issue was just LACP, I can't see why the
dom0 networking would work as expected.
So perhaps there is a unhandled situation somewhere? For instance, would
agr(4) without link1 and bridge(4) work together?
Main Index |
Thread Index |