[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: agr(4) + bridge(4): problems!
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:40:31AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> What you may be seeing is an inherent asymmetry of agr in our kernel.
> Unless some other interface is stacked on top of the agr, there's really
> no reason for packets to be fed to the agr's input routine rather than
> passed directly from the underlying hardware's input routine to the
> network-layer protocol input routine (usually but not always ip_input).
> So -- unless things have changed since last I looked -- that's exactly
> what is done. Packets go _out_ the agr, but they come _in_ the wm
> interfaces. If you attach tcpdump to the agr you may miss all inbound
> traffic, and the bridge likely does too.
> Even in the case of vlan-on-agr, since most network hardware supports
> vlan decapsulation directly it is probably the case that the agr input
> routine is bypassed. Unless my head's gone completely wrong this
> morning and I'm thinking of a different kernel.
I guess you may be mixing things up: I tried a tcpdump on an agr,
and it's seeing inbound and outbound traffics.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |