[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [patch] M2P/P2M abstraction
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:08:32PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 01:17:57PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>>>> The changes in the patch are mechanical. The diff on itself is ok for
>>>> me, but if you intend to introduce an MI API, then it needs to have
>>>> an unique namespace prefix.
>>> Suggestions are open. Something like 'xpmap'?
>> Yes, as we already have xpmap_mtop and xpmap_ptom.
>> Maybe the same names with _fn added ?
> I told christoph privately that I will wait on the forthcoming Xen
> clean-up (where Xen 2 and Xen 3.0 support are dropped), as this will
> simplify a lot of the Xen code, including the use of XPMAP_OFFSET. Then
> I will revisit it later.
From memory, XPMAP_OFFSET is still used for Xen-3 ...
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |