Re: Issues with compiler failures

[Paul Koning <paulkoning%comcast.net@localhost>]

> On Mar 17, 2019, at 3:07 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 04:43:45AM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
>> Both are these failures are in reload specific code.
>> "Reload is the GCC equivalent of Satan." - GCC wiki
>> The best way moving forward would be to adapt the GCC VAX port to not
>> use reload.
> 
> Or accept the fact that there is no active gcc maintainer upstream and
> everyone who has interest in VAX is not willing to spend enough time on
> gcc.

Is there no one willing to take on the gcc maintainer role for vax?  It's not rocket science.

	paul