Re: V240 Status?

["J. Hannken-Illjes" <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>]

On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> 
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 07:54:33PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
>> With sys/kern/vfs_trans.c Rev. 1.26 it is sufficient to take a file
>> system snapshot like:
> 
> I was thinking of a more direct test, like "xc_unicast() a test function wich
> prints something and see if the printf happens".

There is no system call to trigger xcalls.

> I see no relevant MD code that could cause low-prio xcalls to work while
> high-priority ones would not.

Only high priority calls go through MD xc_send_ipi().


>>> Btw: your CD drive will most likely not work at all.
>> 
>> I was able to run the first install kernel from the CD ...
> 
> That is very interesting - we still are looking for the relevant differences
> between the working and the non working ones, see PR 46619.


If I remember right booting from the prom I got a downgrade or lost interrupt.
The installation sets got retrieved through the network.

--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig 
(Germany)