Port-sparc64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Best config for production server WAS: Sun Blade 100 vs Ultra 60



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Feb 16, 2008, at 00:42, Al - image hosting services wrote:

Hi,

Everyone has been so helpful on this list and I have pretty much decided to get the SB 100 based on its size and it looks like it will hold 3 hard
drives without a problem. Also, I can get a rack mount kit for it.

I would still like to get some more advice.

I have been using a Mac G3 running NetBSD (of course). I added an ethernet card and a scsi controller. They configured and work fine in the Mac. Just
so there is no confusion, I copied part of my dmesg from the Mac:

esiop0 at pci1 dev 2 function 0: Symbios Logic 53c896 (ultra2-wide scsi)
esiop0: using on-board RAM
esiop0: interrupting at irq 23
scsibus0 at esiop0: 16 targets, 8 luns per target
esiop1 at pci1 dev 2 function 1: Symbios Logic 53c896 (ultra2-wide scsi)
esiop1: using on-board RAM
esiop1: interrupting at irq 23
scsibus1 at esiop1: 16 targets, 8 luns per target
fxp0 at pci1 dev 3 function 0: i82550 Ethernet, rev 12
fxp0: interrupting at irq 24
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:0e:0c:9b:a7:b6
inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 media interface, rev. 4
inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto

sd0 at scsibus1 target 0 lun 0: <Maxtor 7, Y250P0, YAR4> disk fixed
sd0: 233 GB, 121586 cyl, 64 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 490234752
sectors
sd0: sync (50.00ns offset 8), 16-bit (40.000MB/s) transfers, tagged
queueing
sd1 at scsibus1 target 1 lun 0: <Maxtor 7, Y250P0, YAR4> disk fixed
sd1: 233 GB, 121586 cyl, 64 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 490234752
sectors
sd1: sync (50.00ns offset 8), 16-bit (40.000MB/s) transfers, tagged
queueing

So, I have 2 - 250 gb ide drives on the scsi chain with scsi-to-ide
bridges. The scsi controller and the network card seem to work flawlessly
on the mac. I have a private network for my servers, so I will need a
second network port (the SB 100 only has 1). My question is this, will
these 2 cards work as well in the SB 100 as they do in the Mac, or would a different hard drive controller and eliminating the 3 scsi-to-ide bridges work better? It would be great if someone could tell me what has worked for them with large drives. I could use a different ethernet card if need be, but this is what the colo has so if it ever failed, they could just
put one in.

Mose Suns have firmware support for SymBIOS 53C8xx SCSI controllers so you can probably even boot from your esiop. About the fxp - I've never used one in a Sun but if it works in a Mac there's a pretty good chance it will work well in a Sun as well, most alignment bugs would have bitten on the Mac already.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR7b5LcpnzkX8Yg2nAQL7LwgAoVZiqS7Ws32+mbilDErfUOSFXVAX+EUG
sGIOsQEuUJIVqCq98FpYWJBzC/DVJgVAkETy7hXHyh3g5GaLd0ww/4osELJSAfpA
fOjI7ds/WZIbQtarymVuk+eVbfFaGEDmapHxFjKuv0sirwTCFrpHiQ9BciUyzP1A
0T9UdiNRsaMjoyLGFRZLQ4dsS31/5VBQaXx7yBUPbEMsXsMHKPfa34uVMJqadbEW
UP1VSMNBjgWP5gbpQoddjxL92kKrop2qCQLEybkdQzOEV8APiTBQQfR7RbX6tRsB
eleQRMibd16wF+0w6JuiAj2ABJDRgNsrkR92cDS4lhIe4TPyVsqT4A==
=8QR8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index