Subject: Re: pkgsrc gcc3 vs. sparc64?
To: Andrey Petrov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Rafal Boni <email@example.com>
Date: 06/30/2003 19:45:35
In message <20030630230622.GA21553@NetBSD.ORG>, you write:
-> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:30:47PM -0400, Rafal Boni wrote:
-> I don't know how to fix it properly so workarounds:
-> configure with --disable-shared so there will be no libgcc_s.so,
-> set TARGET_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS to usual -fPIC -DPIC in gcc/Makefile (after c
-> (there will be PIC penalty for libgcc_s.a).
Ah, so I assume I'm not the only one seeing this! That's a good start :-)
I'll try rebuilding with one of those suggestions.
-> I think ideally we should support multilib build and have both 32 and 64
-> bit libraries, I looked there a little but put it off. And I also saw
-> another issue arisen from gcc33 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/
Hmm, supporting both 32 and 64-bit libraries would indeed be nice, but
it's nice to want (esp. since I don't have the time to beat on gcc :-)
Thanks for the workarounds and the pointer to the other problem (I knew
one of you or Martin would have tripped over this before! :-).
Rafal Boni firstname.lastname@example.org
We are all worms. But I do believe I am a glowworm. -- Winston Churchill